Personal tools
Markey response to EPA ANPR
Markey: On Global Warming Decision, White House Hacks Slash While Planet Burns
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Select Committee, 202-225-4081
Markey: On Global Warming Decision, White House Hacks Slash While Planet Burns
Today’s Climate Document A Shadow of Previous Drafts Reviewed by Select Committee
WASHINGTON
(July 11, 2008) – In a shameful display of political interference with
potential regulation of global warming pollution, the Bush
administration has watered down findings on global warming in a
rulemaking notice released today by the Environmental Protection
Agency. The so-called Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking released
today, a response to last year’s Supreme Court’s decision in
Massachusetts v. EPA, pales in comparison to earlier drafts, including
a draft of findings from December of 2007 that was reviewed by staff of
the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming. A draft
of the ANPR from May 2008 was leaked and widely examined.
“Today’s
sanitized and censored global warming proposal is a shadow of what the
scientific experts say is needed to save the planet,” said Rep. Edward
Markey (D-Mass.), Chairman of the Select Committee, which was the only
committee to access all drafts of the documents. “The White House has
taken an earnest attempt by their own climate experts to respond to the
Supreme Court’s mandate to address global warming pollution, and turned
it into a Frankenstein’s monster.”
“On global warming, the White
House uses the slash-and-burn technique. They slash any meaningful
statements or action on global warming, and allow the planet to burn,”
continued Rep. Markey.
A full timeline of the ANPR process,
including the Select Committee’s process to gain access to the December
drafts, and a chart comparing key portions of the various drafts of the
document, is available below this release.
Today’s proposal also
includes an unprecedented airing of grievances by the head of the
Office of Management and Budget, Susan Dudley, and other cabinet
officials, sharply criticizing the very exploration of regulatory
options EPA is issuing.
“This is Bush administration dysfunction on full display,” said Rep. Markey.
The
proposal released today scrubs much of the significant language and
decisions on global warming from the December draft findings. The
December draft showed that, among other findings: EPA Administrator
Stephen Johnson determined that man-made global warming is unequivocal,
the evidence is both compelling and robust, and the administration must
act to prevent harm rather than wait for harm to occur before acting;
that global warming could harm human welfare (the so-called
“endangerment finding”); and that fuel economy standards could be much
higher.
“This ANPR is really the Administration’s Notice of
Prior Result – the failure of President Bush to regulate global warming
pollution. Even when the supreme court of climate science, the IPCC,
and the actual Supreme Court agree that carbon dioxide has serious
consequences for America, the president is unwilling to do his duty to
protect the nation,” continued Rep. Markey.
The regulations
today were created in response to the Supreme Court decision in
Massachusetts v. EPA, which directed the administration to make a
determination on the danger posed by global warming and to propose
regulations under the Clean Air Act for reducing global warming
emissions from motor vehicles and fuels.
# # #